{"id":576,"date":"2016-07-13T00:34:52","date_gmt":"2016-07-13T00:34:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ojen.turnbull.co\/?post_type=resource&#038;p=576"},"modified":"2017-01-05T13:19:35","modified_gmt":"2017-01-05T18:19:35","slug":"top-five-2013-r-v-cole","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole","title":{"rendered":"Top Five 2013: R v Cole"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting.<\/p>\n<h3><em>R v Cole<\/em>, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 34<\/h3>\n<p>In this case, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) considered the admissibility of evidence against Richard Cole, a high school teacher charged with possession of child pornography. His employer, a school board, discovered nude and partially clothed images of an underage student on the laptop issued to Cole by the employer. These were made available to the police, and were the basis of the charge. Although it was not his personal computer, and although Cole had been advised that any files he kept on the laptop were not private, the school board permitted personal use of the computer. Cole therefore argued that he had some expectation of privacy against an unauthorized search by police. The SCC had to clarify the limits of the right to privacy in the context of employees\u2019 personal use of computers issued for work purposes. The full decision is available <a href=\"http:\/\/scc-csc.lexum.com\/scc-csc\/scc-csc\/en\/item\/12615\/index.do\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Key Words: Criminal Law &#8211; Child pornography &#8211; Computer &#8211; Search and seizure &#8211; Evidence &#8211; <em>Charter of Rights and Freedoms<\/em> &#8211; Expectation of privacy &#8211; Workplace law<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","resource-type":[10],"area-of-law":[138,206,217],"subject-area":[18],"grade-level":[24,25],"resource-audience":[],"resource-format":[],"class_list":["post-576","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-type-case-summaries","area-of-law-charter-law","area-of-law-criminal-law","area-of-law-evidence-law","subject-area-law","grade-level-grade-11","grade-level-grade-12"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Top Five 2013: R v Cole - OJEN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Top Five 2013: R v Cole - OJEN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting. R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 S.C.R. [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"OJEN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OJEN\/252115501467864\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-05T18:19:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@OJEN_ROEJ\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole\",\"name\":\"Top Five 2013: R v Cole - OJEN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-13T00:34:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-05T18:19:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Top Five 2013: R v Cole\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/\",\"name\":\"OJEN\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Top Five 2013: R v Cole - OJEN","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Top Five 2013: R v Cole - OJEN","og_description":"Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting. R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 S.C.R. [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole","og_site_name":"OJEN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OJEN\/252115501467864","article_modified_time":"2017-01-05T18:19:35+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@OJEN_ROEJ","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole","url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole","name":"Top Five 2013: R v Cole - OJEN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-13T00:34:52+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-05T18:19:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2013-r-v-cole#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Top Five 2013: R v Cole"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/","name":"OJEN","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/576"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=576"},{"taxonomy":"area-of-law","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/area-of-law?post=576"},{"taxonomy":"subject-area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/subject-area?post=576"},{"taxonomy":"grade-level","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/grade-level?post=576"},{"taxonomy":"resource-audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-audience?post=576"},{"taxonomy":"resource-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-format?post=576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}