{"id":726,"date":"2016-07-13T09:31:00","date_gmt":"2016-07-13T09:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ojen.turnbull.co\/?post_type=resource&#038;p=726"},"modified":"2017-01-05T14:02:25","modified_gmt":"2017-01-05T19:02:25","slug":"top-five-2007-r-v-clayton","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton","title":{"rendered":"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting.<\/p>\n<h3><em>R v Clayton<\/em>, [2007] 2 SCR 725, 2007 SCC 32<\/h3>\n<p>\u201cWithin minutes of receiving a 911 call indicating that a number of persons were openly displaying handguns in a strip club\u2019s parking lot, the police stopped the first car leaving from the lot\u2019s rear exit\u201d [para. 1].&nbsp; The Supreme Court of Canada was tasked with determining whether this search contravened sections 8 and 9 of the <em>Charter<\/em>.&nbsp; The police detention and search of two men at the site of a roadblock was found not to infringe s. 8 and s. 9 of the <em>Charter&nbsp;<\/em>because the roadblock was \u201creasonably necessary to respond to the seriousness of the offence and the threat to the police\u2019s and public\u2019s safety\u201d [para. 41].&nbsp;The full decision is available <a href=\"http:\/\/scc.lexum.org\/en\/2007\/2007scc32\/2007scc32.html\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","resource-type":[10],"area-of-law":[138,206,217,219],"subject-area":[18],"grade-level":[23,24,25],"resource-audience":[],"resource-format":[],"class_list":["post-726","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-type-case-summaries","area-of-law-charter-law","area-of-law-criminal-law","area-of-law-evidence-law","area-of-law-legal-process","subject-area-law","grade-level-grade-10","grade-level-grade-11","grade-level-grade-12"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Top Five 2007: R v Clayton - OJEN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton - OJEN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting. R v Clayton, [2007] 2 SCR 725, 2007 SCC [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"OJEN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OJEN\/252115501467864\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-05T19:02:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@OJEN_ROEJ\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton\",\"name\":\"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton - OJEN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-13T09:31:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-05T19:02:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/\",\"name\":\"OJEN\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton - OJEN","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton - OJEN","og_description":"Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting. R v Clayton, [2007] 2 SCR 725, 2007 SCC [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton","og_site_name":"OJEN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OJEN\/252115501467864","article_modified_time":"2017-01-05T19:02:25+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@OJEN_ROEJ","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton","url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton","name":"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton - OJEN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-13T09:31:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-05T19:02:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2007-r-v-clayton#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Top Five 2007: R v Clayton"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/","name":"OJEN","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/726"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/726\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=726"},{"taxonomy":"area-of-law","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/area-of-law?post=726"},{"taxonomy":"subject-area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/subject-area?post=726"},{"taxonomy":"grade-level","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/grade-level?post=726"},{"taxonomy":"resource-audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-audience?post=726"},{"taxonomy":"resource-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-format?post=726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}