{"id":771,"date":"2016-07-13T10:14:16","date_gmt":"2016-07-13T15:14:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ojen.turnbull.co\/?post_type=resource&#038;p=771"},"modified":"2017-01-05T12:37:45","modified_gmt":"2017-01-05T17:37:45","slug":"top-five-2009","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009","title":{"rendered":"Top Five 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting.<\/p>\n<p>Summaries of important legal cases from 2009, as identified by the Honourable Mr. Justice Stephen Goudge of the Ontario Court of Appeal at OJEN&#8217;s 2009 Summer Law Institute.<\/p>\n<p>1.&nbsp;<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/1.-Top-Five-2009_R-v-Grant.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 SCR 353<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In this case, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) created a new test for determining whether evidence obtained by a Charter breach should be excluded under s. 24(2) of the Charter, replacing the test from R. v. Collins. The R. v. Grant case was released concurrently with R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34. The full decision is available <a href=\"http:\/\/scc.lexum.org\/en\/2009\/2009scc32\/2009scc32.html\" target=\"_blank\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2.-Top-Five-2009_R-v-Harrison.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">R v Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 SCR 494<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a decision rendered concurrently with R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) applied the new analysis for excluding evidence under s. 24(2) of the Charter to determine if evidence of cocaine trafficking should be excluded. The full decision is available&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/scc.lexum.org\/en\/2009\/2009scc34\/2009scc34.html\" target=\"_blank\">here. <\/a><\/p>\n<p>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/3.-Top-Five-2009_Alberta-v-Hutterian-Brethren.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009 SCC 37, [2009] 2 SCR 567<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This case addressed whether the new licensing requirements in the province of Alberta, requiring every driver\u2019s license to contain a photograph of the licensee, violates freedom of religion under s. 2(a) of the Charter. The full decision is avilable <a href=\"http:\/\/scc.lexum.org\/en\/2009\/2009scc37\/2009scc37.html\" target=\"_blank\">here. <\/a><\/p>\n<p>4.&nbsp;<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/4.-Top-Five-2009_CFS-v-GVTA.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Canadian Federation of Students v Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority \u2013 British Columbia Component, 2009 SCC 31, [2009] 2 SCR 295<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This case dealt with whether a regulation banning \u201cpolitical\u201d advertisements on buses violated freedom of expression under s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The full decision is available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scc-csc.gc.ca\/case-dossier\/cms-sgd\/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=31845\" target=\"_blank\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>5. <a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/5.-Top-Five-2009_AC-v-Manitoba.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 SCR 181<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This case examined the ability of the courts to order medical treatment for children under 16 years of age. The full decision is available <a href=\"http:\/\/scc.lexum.org\/en\/2009\/2009scc30\/2009scc30.html\" target=\"_blank\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","resource-type":[10],"area-of-law":[138,206,210,217],"subject-area":[18],"grade-level":[23,24,25],"resource-audience":[],"resource-format":[],"class_list":["post-771","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry","resource-type-case-summaries","area-of-law-charter-law","area-of-law-criminal-law","area-of-law-family-law","area-of-law-evidence-law","subject-area-law","grade-level-grade-10","grade-level-grade-11","grade-level-grade-12"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Top Five 2009 - OJEN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Top Five 2009 - OJEN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting. Summaries of important legal cases from 2009, as identified [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"OJEN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OJEN\/252115501467864\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-05T17:37:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@OJEN_ROEJ\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009\",\"name\":\"Top Five 2009 - OJEN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-13T15:14:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-05T17:37:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Top Five 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/\",\"name\":\"OJEN\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Top Five 2009 - OJEN","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Top Five 2009 - OJEN","og_description":"Each year at OJEN\u2019s Toronto Summer Law Institute, a judge from the Court of Appeal for Ontario identifies five cases that are of significance in the educational setting. This summary, based on these comments and observations, is appropriate for discussion and debate in the classroom setting. Summaries of important legal cases from 2009, as identified [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009","og_site_name":"OJEN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/OJEN\/252115501467864","article_modified_time":"2017-01-05T17:37:45+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@OJEN_ROEJ","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009","url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009","name":"Top Five 2009 - OJEN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-07-13T15:14:16+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-05T17:37:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/resource\/top-five-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Top Five 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/","name":"OJEN","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/771"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"resource-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-type?post=771"},{"taxonomy":"area-of-law","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/area-of-law?post=771"},{"taxonomy":"subject-area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/subject-area?post=771"},{"taxonomy":"grade-level","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/grade-level?post=771"},{"taxonomy":"resource-audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-audience?post=771"},{"taxonomy":"resource-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ojen2024.turnbull.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource-format?post=771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}